> > We need a release from master before I think then it sounds possible to me.
Sounds good to me. Then we can take the master to jakarta.* and pom version to 3.0.0 Side note: our jakarta artifacts run well with CDI SE/notEE 2.0 > certification already but were only tested against javax TCK AFAIK. > I think the Jakarta EE CDI TCK is ready to use. I will check that. Regards. Gurkan On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:42 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > We need a release from master before I think then it sounds possible to me. > > Side note: our jakarta artifacts run well with CDI SE/notEE 2.0 > certification already but were only tested against javax TCK AFAIK. > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:40, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > OK I agree. > > Lets focus on improving the OWB. > > What is the latest status of TCK covering regarding latest Jakarta EE CDI > > specification? > > Also, as I remembered Mark created a branch for Jakarta EE API? Can we > > migrate those to master? > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > I agree comments are important but they must not paraphrase the code, > > look > > > at the two first comments of this commit: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/c2b07386e2bd9a702a4fab07696e1a0cdcb792c7#diff-75cef79164caacdbcadbd8e8bcc87c3eR48 > > > . > > > I learn that the construct constructs and the init method intiializes, > > not > > > sure it is worth the 6 lines. > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > < > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:30, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > I again totally agree with you but think about the others. For > > example, I > > > > may not be clever to understand what the code is doing without any > > > comment. > > > > For me, comments are as important as source code. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > About classloader proxy: > > > > > > > > > > suspect I can need a more precise request - sadly I wrote this > class > > > so I > > > > > understand it :s. > > > > > But the only thing in this whole class is putting a proxy class in > a > > > map > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/blob/master/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/service/ClassLoaderProxyService.java#L135 > > > > > . > > > > > Not sure we need a comment thanks to the class name, or does the > name > > > > miss > > > > > "ClassDefiningService" explicitly? > > > > > > > > > > About spring: I hate this kind of codebase, you take way more time > to > > > try > > > > > to read the comment than the code source and I never got luck I > > assume > > > > > cause when I spend 5mn on the doc I always end up reading the code > > > which > > > > > takes way less time. Writing so much javadoc makes sense when you > use > > > the > > > > > code as an API - our SPI is into this category and we should > explain > > > the > > > > > expectations and requirements - but impl is not in that category at > > > all. > > > > If > > > > > an user uses owb-impl in his project there is an issue. Since we > > don't > > > > > publish our impl modules javadoc I think it is saner to keep the > > > comments > > > > > for not obvious explanations - for ex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/blob/master/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/config/BeansDeployer.java#L1424 > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > Hope it explains a bit where I'm coming from and what I'm hoping we > > > > target. > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 15:21, Gurkan Erdogdu < > > cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> > > > a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > Also, for how to write comments, please look at Spring or > > SpringBoot > > > > code > > > > > > base. > > > > > > Just an example file : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/master/spring-beans/src/main/java/org/springframework/beans/BeanUtils.java > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:09 PM Gurkan Erdogdu < > > > > cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/blob/master/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/service/ClassLoaderProxyService.java > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:46 PM Mark Struberg > > > > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> We intentionally removed comments which do not add any value. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Just check the history. We deleted many @inheritdoc without > any > > > > > > >> additional information. > > > > > > >> Or JavaDoc like /** sets the blablub */ for setBlablub(); > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> It just adds useless lines of code and results in 30% more > code > > > one > > > > > has > > > > > > >> to parse when reading it. > > > > > > >> Of course, javadoc which describes WHY and HOW we do it is > > highly > > > > > > welcome! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Back in the early 2000 there have been metrics for code which > > > misses > > > > > > >> JavaDocs. This mantra is refuted since a long time. > > > > > > >> I'm sure there are plenty of other tasks which make perfect > > sense. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> LieGrue, > > > > > > >> strub > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Am 05.06.2020 um 10:48 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu < > > > > > > cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com > > > > > > >> >: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Hi folks > > > > > > >> > I am reviewing the source code, but there are codes without > > > > comments > > > > > > in > > > > > > >> > many places. Please can you review the codes and write > > > comments?I > > > > > know > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > >> > is boring, but commenting is very important. Otherwise, it > is > > > not > > > > > > >> possible > > > > > > >> > to understand what is going on in your code. > > > > > > >> > Regards. > > > > > > >> > Gurkan > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Gurkan Erdogdu > > > > > > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Gurkan Erdogdu > > > > > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Gurkan Erdogdu > > > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Gurkan Erdogdu > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
