Hi, I'll probably restate my position on that: if EE 9 brings significatively new API yes - a quick review shows it is 1-1 with EE 8 but I can have missed sthg, looked quite fast. if EE9==EE8 then we can stay as we are I think avoiding to maintain two branches we can't merge regularly.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 10:26, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi > After the 2.x release, can we get the master to 3.0.0 to support upcoming > Jakarta EE 9 release with jakarta.* namespace? > > I also favor to use the Jakarta EE CDI API instead of using the Apache > based api. > Regards > Gurkan > > -- > Gurkan Erdogdu > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com >
