Hi Remy

> I would think you should keep "tomcat7" too, it's not really the same idea
> as modules/owb.
>
I have looked at both implementations and both are the same purpose,
injection into  Servlet related classes and get the current Principal from
the request. In Tomcat/OWB module, its integration is more natural than the
Tomcat7 module.
What is the benefit of using Tomcat7 in OWB?
Regards.
Gurkan


On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:33 AM Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 1:54 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 to drop jms module, never saw any usage of it
> > -0.5 for tomcat7, rational being that if we want to do it, we should (at
> > the same time) 1. ensure tomcat module is at least 1-1 (not the case I
> > think) + released properly and not just a sandbox and 2. drop jetty
> > integration too (which can be envisioned since we worked to integrate OWB
> > in jetty itself) but dropping tomcat7 module without these two conditions
> > looks like an user regression to me.
> >
>
> I would think you should keep "tomcat7" too, it's not really the same idea
> as modules/owb. The main problem is using a version number in the module
> name, that creates confusion in the long run and gives the impression it is
> outdated. Tomcat 7 will be eoled "soon", for example.
>
> Rémy
>
>
> >
> > I guess ee modules can move to tomee too - any other consumer - with the
> > relevant adaptations to our codebase?
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 29 juin 2020 à 13:38, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hi folks
> > > I would like to discuss to remove the following modules from the OWB
> code
> > > base.
> > >
> > >    - webbeans-jms : We introduced this module years ago for JMS but
> > frankly
> > >    never see any usage. Also, it was not completed.
> > >    - webbeans-tomcat7 : We introduced this modules for Tomcat7
> > integration
> > >    but now it is useless and Tomcat already includes this integration
> > with
> > >    more natural way (
> > >    https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/master/modules/owb)
> > >
> > > WDYT? Any objection?
> > > Regards.
> > > Gurkan
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Reply via email to