[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17627658#comment-17627658
 ] 

Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1416:
-----------------------------------------

Maybe but this quote also does not bring any requirements (compared to other 
parts) so sounds like an useless sentence in current form, I agree.

Both options have pitfalls - not the same indeed ;) - so think our current 
state is likely the safer whereas relaxing it can be convenient in some cases 
it will break others so not sure it is worth the effort being said there are 
solution to handle the case you reference cleanly already, so quite mitigated 
for now.

> Possible misintepretation of spec regarding Unproxyable bean types
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OWB-1416
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1416
>             Project: OpenWebBeans
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Alexander Larsen
>            Priority: Major
>
> OWB seems to throw an exception for all unproxyable normal scoped beans. I 
> think that this might be incorrect.
> The 
> [specification|https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-spec.html#unproxyable] 
> says the "A bean type must be proxyable if an injection point resolves to a 
> bean", not that all the types of the bean must be proxyable. In other words, 
> as long as the bean is a legal bean, and all injection point resolving to 
> this bean is a proxyable type - no exception should be thrown.
> In the part about [contextual 
> references|https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-spec.html#contextual_reference],
>  there is further indications that unproxyable types should be allowed in the 
> set of types for the bean. It's only when you try to get a reference(injected 
> or by bean manager) to an unproxyable type, and the bean must be proxied 
> (normal scoped, intercepted or decorated) an exception should thrown.
> Also, the [Weld user guide suggests introducing an interface as a solution to 
> having an unproxyable 
> bean|https://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html_single/#_client_proxies].
> The current OWB implementation makes a pattern of having an interface and 
> (one or more) implementation class with final fields/methods somewhat 
> difficult :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to