all sounds good to me Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> hi folks! > > We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests. > There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests: > > * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for > Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement the > functionality as OWB plugin if someone really needs it though. > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. > they assume a specified order class annotations before method annotations > for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors with > the same @Priority the order is unspecified. > * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for > empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break the > JakartaEE rules alltogether. > > > Things I want to change yet before the release: > > * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until someone > wants to contribute fixes to it. > * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite > parts. > > > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > >
