[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17693474#comment-17693474
]
Mark Struberg commented on OWB-1426:
------------------------------------
Turns out that the CDITCK challenge got accepted
https://github.com/jakartaee/cdi-tck/issues/429.
Closing this ticket
> Missing bean types for indirectly implemented interfaces
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OWB-1426
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1426
> Project: OpenWebBeans
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core, TCK
> Reporter: Jean-Louis Monteiro
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> The following TCK test is failing in OWB and I think it's a good one from the
> spec point of view.
>
> {color:#067d17}org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.definition.bean.BeanDefinitionTest{color}
>
> The spec says
> [https://jakarta.ee/specifications/cdi/4.0/jakarta-cdi-spec-4.0.html#managed_bean_types]
>
> {quote}The unrestricted set of bean types for a managed bean contains the
> bean class, every superclass and all interfaces it implements directly or
> indirectly.
> The resulting set of bean types for a managed bean consists only of [legal
> bean
> types|https://jakarta.ee/specifications/cdi/4.0/jakarta-cdi-spec-4.0.html#legal_bean_types],
> all other types are removed from the set of bean types.
> Note the additional restrictions upon bean types of beans with normal scopes
> defined in [Unproxyable bean
> types|https://jakarta.ee/specifications/cdi/4.0/jakarta-cdi-spec-4.0.html#unproxyable].
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
