Hi, I don't care much but think java 21 will not bring anything to the codebase so 17 sounds as the best compromise from my window.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 4 juin 2024 à 12:58, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > personally, I would favor 17 as a baseline for now. > Might be less confusing for people in the EE-verse as it it would be > roughly aligned with the EE spec java version. > > Gruß > r > > > Am 04.06.2024 um 12:33 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID > >: > > > > hi! > > > > I did start to work on moving Meecrowave to natively support jakartaEE > without shading right now while at ApacheConEU. > > > > Which target JVM should we target? Is 21 fine? Is there any need to > still support Java17? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > >
