Hi Andreas, > a) Is the process outlined above okay for all of you?>
The process sounds well thought out. thoughts/comments below... #2 seems redundant since the request will go to the "private" list (which includes all PPMC members); were you thinking special attention was needed beyond this? Perhaps this means one of the PPMC members acknowledges and speaks in for/against, calls for discussion (and perhaps a vote later if needed). #3 I would be happy to be a designated "backup", but all PPMC should effectively be tertiary backups ) #4 I think that if the checklist is satisfied by one of the reviewers for a submission, they could send an email to "private" (i.e., PPMC) indicated "looks good, going to approve/post in X (24) hours if no one objects and we need to further discuss and (if not resolved) call a vote? add of course #5 If PPMC cannot agree, seek advice from the Apache Incubator PMC (and perhaps Apache legal/trademark where we would likely be sent if it comes to this). > c) Who wants to help with implementing the submission form?> I can try to help; would be fun to see the insides of the website repo. having built and deployed it locally only to update some esoteric layouts/css. > d) Who wants to act as a backup while I am out?> o/ (raises hand) > e) Is the idea of using our private mailing list as temp solution fine > It is what happens anyway now (without a FORM and its structured fields). So fine by me... in fact, we would need to consider the FORM supporting attachments or have the submitter supply a link to some doc store. > (can anyone send sth to this?)?> was afraid to ask, but what is "sth" ( Stash file type?)? > f) What do we want to use to share credentials? SVN, Lastpass, sth else?> I think that is for the PPMC to discuss? - Matt
