Yeah I agree putting a short statement/disclaimer on the state on the repo’s README that way is clear that “use on your own risk or it might take time before someone responds to an issue”
It also could have a link back to the wiki page. — Carlos On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 11:33 AM Michael Marth <mma...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I am not sure if the people new to OpenWhisk would look at that table. I, > for one, was not even aware it existed ( > How about putting a badge/note at the top of the experimental repo’s > READMEs? That would probably be seen. > Additional benefit: the badge could be raised as a PR against these repos > so that the main committers can agree/disagree if that repo is experimental > or not. > > Wdyt? > Michael > > > On 09/12/17 21:22, "Carlos Santana" <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Michael > > I got the list by going over every repo recently and reviewing latest > state. Which for the most part I follow all changes, PR, issues to > every > OpenWhisk repo :-) > > What do you think if we add a column to the Repo Status Wiki page? > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/GitHub+Repository+Status > > --Carlos > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:14 PM Michael Marth <mma...@adobe.com.invalid > > > wrote: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > Thanks for sharing that! > > Slide 4 made me wonder on the distinction between “maintained” repos > and > > “experimental” repos. I totally agree that this distinction exists in > > practice, but I wondered how you got to the list. And I should add: > I don’t > > dispute the repos you put on the “experimental” list. My question was > > whether the list of experimental repos is common knowledge (and if > not: how > > we can make it so) > > > > Cheers > > Michael > > > > On 07/12/17 04:57, "Carlos Santana" <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This week I gave a talk internal in IBM to illustrate the work > recently > > done in braking openwhisk components into multiple repositories, > and > > how we > > integrate them in our downstream deployment. > > > > Some slides I think are useful to share with the community it > gives a > > map > > where are components located. > > > > Also shows how the CLI code was finally migrated to it's own > repo, and > > manual synchronization stopped. > > > > I uploaded the slides to the wiki [1] > > > > Let me know if the link works and you are able to download. > > > > There is also an old issue [2] I just closed that contains one > of the > > main > > slides. > > > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/74689638/Whisk-Component-Repos-Public.pdf?api=v2 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/422 > > > > -- Carlos > > > > > > > > >
