On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Carlos Santana <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...So an example we could have
> dev/0.1.0-RC1/openwhisk-0.1.0.tgz
> dev/0.1.0-RC2/openwhisk-0.1.0.tgz
> dev/0.1.0-RC3/openwhisk-0.1.0.tgz ...

Sounds good, +1 (with the "-incubating" marker in filenames of course)

To me the only thing that really counts when voting on a release
archive is its (sha-256 or other) digest, the filename helps but
that's not a valid unique ID.

-Bertrand

Reply via email to