Hi Rodric, I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of installation.
I can definitely work on that. Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating the result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release. I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have documented some known issues in the instruction. Best wishes. Vincent Hou (侯胜博) Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: [email protected], Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -----Rodric Rabbah <[email protected]> wrote: ----- To: [email protected] From: Rodric Rabbah <[email protected]> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the vote. In completing this checking list: [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with scan-code) [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo gradle-wrapper.jar). I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I opened the following issues: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207 https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208 https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug) https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210 https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug) https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212 https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug, blocks deployment) https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214 Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world. I'd like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and I ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug). -r
