That is great news Dave!

Thanks for all your diligence in getting to this point. 

My only ask would be to update the table (README) in the release repo. 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release
and the automation JSON: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/tools/config.json
to include an entry (with hash of commit) for this new repo.

In addition, I would appreciate it if you could follow the release 
process/steps there and open any issues you find with the exiting 
documentation (when following the manual process or auto. process),
i.e., "instructions for release managers (
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/release_instructions.md
).

Of course, Vincent is the "go to" person for questions on docs/process

Cheers to you!

-Matt 



From:   "David P Grove" <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   10/23/2018 10:40 AM
Subject:        towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer





Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is
completed, we can start working towards the first formal release of
composer from the Apache OpenWhisk.

The motivation for a formal release is that we should have a formal Apache
release to enable us to publish an openwhisk-composer package to npm (to
replace the prior ibm-functions/composer npm package).

I'm willing to act as release manager for the initial release of this
package.

I believe the main technical work to be done before we can start preparing
a release candidate and then initiating the voting process is to agree on
the npm package name (suggestion: openwhisk-composer), and update the
documentation/code in the openwhisk-composer code base  accordingly.  Are
there any other items that I have overlooked?

--dave




Reply via email to