"James W Dubee" <jwdu...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 04/01/2019 10:37:04 AM: > > Hey Dave, > > I believe Jason Peterson did an emergency patch this weekend for the > alarms provider. We should use hash > 92b0ac8b0b006ef6c9395271fd17afa6c83c14b1 instead for alarms for the > release. Other than that +1. >
Thanks James. I think what we have to do procedurally is make a 2.0.1 release of the alarm provider with that bug fix and start a new round of voting for just that. I can do that within the next day or so. --dave
