Agreed, good idea. On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 04:59, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great idea Bertrand to have the digest of the script printed. +1 > > - Carlos Santana > @csantanapr > > > On Apr 9, 2019, at 1:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Incubation mentor hat on - I've seen a few pastebin and similar links > > to rcverify logs recently in VOTE threads. > > > > I think it's much better to include those logs inline so that they end > > up in ASF mail archives (*). > > > > They are the kind of things that might be needed if for any reason we > > want to to back to release votes later, and if logs are on external > > systems there's no guarantee that they'll still be there. > > > > I contributed two minor changes to rcverify recently which output the > > scripts digest as well as the digests of the verified source archives > > - this makes it absolutely clear what was verified and with which > > version of the script, so if we include that output in the mail > > archives that's a solid record of verification and voting. > > > > -Bertrand > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
