Good idea to define naming schemes like how maven does for plugins. For example, the official project plugins follow a naming scheme of maven-foo-plugin, while third party plugins follow a naming scheme of foo-maven-plugin. Similar to the distinction between “Apache Maven Foo Plugin” versus “Foo Plugin for Apache Maven”.
Following Spark’s example is probably a good bet since they’re one of the top projects that gets trademark violations in the wild that I know of. On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:12, Matt Rutkowski <mrutkow...@apache.org> wrote: > Rodric, > > Great reference and agree with Bertrand that we should copy Spark's > stellar example. > > To that end, please review PR which accomplishes that goal: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/pull/387/files > > Thanks, > Matt > > On 2019/06/12 11:15:51, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The discussion about our graduation on the general list [1] led to a > > question relating to how we manage the project trademarks. Specifically, > > our project website does not provide any guidance we can point to when > > needed. We have previously discussed the use of the OpenWhisk name in a > > prior instance [2] but did not document our guidance on the website. > Apache > > Spark is one example that might be useful for reference, available at > > http://spark.apache.org/trademarks.html. It provides appropriate links > to > > the ASF [3] and summarizes the key points of the policy. > > > > This email is to solicit help authoring our own project trademarks policy > > summary page, and to solicit feedback on additional points to summarize > > relating to the use of the name OpenWhisk. > > > > For example, how do we handle the use of OpenWhisk in a GitHub repository > > name? A small sample of searches on popular Apache project names leads > one > > to believe this is quite common. In some cases it may be sufficient for > > the repository to use the full project name "Apache OpenWhisk" > prominently > > in the project description and first mentions in the documentation (with > > links to the project website). When do we require an acknowledgement of > the > > trademark, or ask a repository to be renamed? > > > > -r > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/02dd71dcc6b2f326015954388c61d06d12f982fd64f34ee40e076171@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > [2] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99e2431472d015fb23af38d1c2dab47ef9eb5a8a980cf2b80ca0035b@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > > > > [3] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#products > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
