2019-09-30 05:05:41 UTC - chetanm: @Mohammad Shahrad @Jonathan Balkind I believe you are the author of the above paper. It would be very helpful if you can share your learning and any feedback on OpenWhisk architecture (improvement areas) with the wider community.
We hold a biweekly tech interchange on Wednesday. We can use that for such discussion or if you prefer mail route then that should be fine as well. +1 : Mohammad Shahrad https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3UDXSFA6/p1569819941007900 ---- 2019-09-30 05:07:35 UTC - chetanm: Also I would be interested to know if you tried to make use of Concurrency support in OpenWhisk [1] in your benchmark. It may help in reducing the overhead of context switches and help in better utilizing the caches [1]: <https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/docs/concurrency.md> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3UDXSFA6/p1569820055009200 ---- 2019-09-30 15:15:23 UTC - Mohammad Shahrad: Thanks for your interest, @chetanm and others! We really enjoyed working with OpenWhisk for our study and would love to share insights with the community. We will present the paper at MICRO ’19 (<https://www.microarch.org/micro52/>) on Oct. 16 (please come to our talk if attending). As we are now busy preparing the final things for the presentation, it’d be great if we could attend a tech interchange after that date. Let us coordinate by email on this. https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3UDXSFA6/p1569856523015400 ---- 2019-09-30 16:21:49 UTC - chetanm: No hurry there. We have one scheduled for Oct 30 per current plan so we can use that https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3UDXSFA6/p1569860509017100 ----
