2020-05-11 05:05:48 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Question: In the case where a Javascript activation is handled by a warm container, does the Controller still ship the code to the Invoker? https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589173548246300 ---- 2020-05-11 05:38:54 UTC - Jiang PengCheng: sorry for late, it seems caused by ES side? https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589175534246400?thread_ts=1588354797.201900&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2020-05-11 05:41:17 UTC - Jiang PengCheng: no, actually controller will not ship code to invoker at all, it just pass action's name to invoker, and invoker will decide whether it need to fetch codes from database and inject code to container or just use warm container +1 : Dominic Kim, Kostis Kaffes https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589175677248100?thread_ts=1589175677.248100&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2020-05-11 17:08:46 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Thank you! https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589216926248600?thread_ts=1589175677.248100&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2020-05-11 19:03:48 UTC - Brendan Doyle: Could you kick off another retry of the build whenever. I for some reason still don't have access to do so although I think I should be a committer now https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589223828248800?thread_ts=1588966508.242600&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2020-05-11 19:41:38 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: sure https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589226098249000?thread_ts=1588966508.242600&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2020-05-11 19:41:43 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: email came through https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589226103249200?thread_ts=1588966508.242600&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2020-05-11 23:25:34 UTC - Brendan Doyle: fixing the swagger didn't realize there was a validation task available to test https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589239534249600?thread_ts=1588966508.242600&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ---- 2020-05-11 23:54:52 UTC - Brendan Doyle: Is there a known bug where an activation duration can end up being significantly longer than the configured timeout? We recently upgraded a year's worth of changes and we have one function that is managing to run for two to three minutes even though our system max is one minute and the function doc in couchdb is definitely still 60 seconds. It seems like there's a possible akka http hang in the container client, but didn't know if it's reasonable to expect that to hit a single user's function and only that function consistently judging off this comment in `ApacheBlockingContainerClient`:
``` * The reason we still use this class for the action container is a mysterious hang * in the Akka http client where a future fails to properly timeout and we have not * determined why that is. ``` https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1589241292253600?thread_ts=1589241292.253600&cid=C3TPCAQG1 ----
