JFYI, I also believe we need to upgrade the akka family version and it's an
ugly way but anyway I could build OW on m1 mac as is like this:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5196

In short, you can specify the osx-x86_64 version of protoc.

-dom


2022년 12월 26일 (월) 오전 1:05, Brendan Doyle <bdoyle0...@gmail.com>님이 작성:

> Hi Michele,
>
> The Akka patch should be safe. I’ve worked pretty extensively with the
> 2.6.x Akka series, and it should be fine to just update the gradle to bump
> to 2.6.19. Unless there’s a breaking change in protobuf from 3.4 to 3.5
> (which I highly doubt since I use proto with my Akka use as well) there
> shouldn’t be any problem.
>
> The continued use of Lightbend Akka is going to be a large discussion point
> for the community whenever we meet in January as 2.6.19 is the last Apache
> licensed version.
>
> Brendan
>
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 10:21 AM Michele Sciabarra <mich...@sciabarra.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello, I tried to build openwhisk on ARM (most notably on my Mac, an
> Apple
> > M1) and I always fails because of this error:
> >
> > execution failed for task ':core:scheduler:generateProto'.
> > > Could not resolve all files for configuration
> > ':core:scheduler:protobufToolsLocator_protoc'.
> >    > Could not find protoc-3.4.0-osx-aarch_64.exe
> > (com.google.protobuf:protoc:3.4.0).
> >      Searched in the following locations:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/google/protobuf/protoc/3.4.0/protoc-3.4.0-osx-aarch_64.exe
> >
> > Looks like version 3.4 does not have an ARM version.
> > The funny thing is that if we try to use version 3.5, there IS a version
> > for ARM
> >
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/google/protobuf/protoc/3.5.0/protoc-3.5.0-linux-aarch_64.exe
> >
> > However looks like it is actually a transitive dependency of
> akka-protobuf
> > so we should upgrade akka.
> >
> > We are using akka 2.6.12, the latest version is 2.6.19,
> >
> > Are there any plan to upgrade akka?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Michele Sciabarra
> >   mich...@sciabarra.com
> >
>

[image: Mailtrack]
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
Sender
notified by
Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;>
22.
12. 26. 오전 10:33:28

Reply via email to