Sure, I'll check RC and share the result.

Bests,
Dongjoon.

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:50 PM Owen O'Malley <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dongjoon,
>    Can you check out the new 1.5 and 1.6 release candidates? I'd like to
> get the replacement releases out quickly.
>
> Thank you,
>    Owen
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 4:32 AM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Owen, Alan, Jesus and all.
>>
>> Sorry for being late, but it seems that 1.6.4 and 1.5.11 introduced a
>> correctness regression in the following patch.
>>
>>     ORC-644: Support positional mapping for nested types.
>>
>> Although Apache ORC configuration, 'orc.force.positional.evolution', is
>> false,
>> positional mapping is applied for the nested struct types currently and
>> gives a wrong result for all downstream.
>>
>> Could you review the following PR?
>>
>>     https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/545
>>     ORC-667: Positional mapping for nested struct types should not applied
>> by default
>>
>> Bests,
>> Dongjoon.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:17 PM Owen O'Malley <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > With three +1's the vote passes. Thank you, Alan & Jesus!
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:32 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
>> > [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1.
>> > >
>> > > Same as for 1.5.11 RC. Downloaded the artifacts, checked signature,
>> hash,
>> > > LICENSE, NOTICE. Compiled the java code and run test suite.
>> > >
>> > > -Jesús
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:28 AM Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1.  Checked the signature and hash, looked over the LICENSE and
>> NOTICE
>> > > > files and checked to make sure there were no non-image or font
>> binary
>> > > files
>> > > > in the release, and did a check for license headers.  Did a build in
>> > the
>> > > > Ubuntu 18 Docker image.
>> > > >
>> > > > Alan.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 2020/09/03 00:57:22, "Owen O'Malley" <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > OK, I accidentally messed up the version setting in the java
>> > benchmark
>> > > > > code, so I rolled a
>> > > > > new RC.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > All, Should we release the following artifacts as ORC 1.6.4?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.6.4/
>> > > > > tag: https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.6.4rc1
>> > > > > jiras:
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC/fixforversion/12348176
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to