autumnust opened a new pull request #909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/909


   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. File a JIRA issue first and use it as a prefix of your PR title, e.g., 
`ORC-001: Fix ABC`.
     2. Use your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes instead of 
describing the problem.
     3. Make PR title and description complete because these will be the 
permanent commit log.
     4. If possible, provide a concise and reproducible example to reproduce 
the issue for a faster review.
     5. If the PR is unfinished, use GitHub PR Draft feature.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   There's individual instance of `OutStream` within each TreeWriter created by 
`WriterContext#createStream` method. Within `OutStream`, there are totally 3 
buffers: 
   
   - current: the regular input buffer holding uncompressed, unencrypted bytes.
   - compress: the output buffer holding compressed bytes 
   - overflow: same as "compress" but only used when the last compression 
output is larger than remaining capacity of compress buffer. 
   
   Potentially the compress and overflow buffer don't have to be allocated 
individually within each `OutStream` object, but shared across all of them so 
to save memory allocation. 
   
   This PR is the first step for sharing the compression output buffer, which 
refactors internal of `OutStream` and make the relevant object bundled together 
since they are logically related(and details of dealing with overflow doesn't 
have to be visible). This refactoring makes it easier to share the compression 
output buffer as a pass-in arguments in the follow-up PR. 
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   For the context of ORC-997, this change makes the compression output buffer, 
as a single entity, easier to be shared and passed in from caller. 
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   
   There's no functional changes from this PR so passing all existed unit 
tests. Also added a new test in `TestOutStream` to make sure that, the scenario 
where `codec.compress()` returns false (meaning the compression output is 
larger than original input) is also covered in the unit test.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@orc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to