There has been some confusion on how to present the performance information on http://builds.osafoundation.org/tinderbox/Chandler/status.html
Based on the feedback (and my own initial confusion), here's something I think would be more readily understandable: m5 | Median | change % | change time 0.594 | 1.143 | 192 | 0.549 159 | 98 | 62 | -61 All values (except %) in seconds. The first row would be orange (or red, depending on color thresholds, using the Tinderbox standard colors), and the second row would be green. So the sign of the change time column values changed - negative means we got faster which is good. And in the % column values below 100 are smaller, which are good, and above 100 is bad. Would that make more sense, or is there some other way you would present the change columns? Note that the table format and how we get the Median etc. will probably change so that we can get faster feedback, but the issue of negative/positive values and % value should not change. -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
