Philippe Bossut wrote: > (c)- do the incremental updates on a wx branch and merge post 0.6 (and > pay a continuous extra maintenance cost during the 0.6 debug phase...)
I vote for c). However, that still leaves a couple of options open as to how to do this. One is to branch the whole tree. The other is to branch just the internal/wx directory (need a relver scheme to identify the branch binaries). That way David would be on the trunk for all other stuff except wx automatically. Any wx fix that made it to the trunk would have to be ported to the branch. In the beginning of 0.7 we would merge the branch to trunk (most likely overwriting all trunk changes in case of conflict). -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
