dev  

Messages by Date

• 2026/10/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/10/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Ryan Blue
• 2026/10/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Steven Wu
• 2026/10/07 Draft board report for October Julien Le Dem
• 2026/10/07 Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Daniel Weeks
• 2026/10/07 Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Andrew Lamb
• 2026/10/07 Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Daniel Weeks
• 2026/10/07 Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Russell Spitzer
• 2026/10/07 Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Micah Kornfield
• 2026/10/07 Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Adrian Garcia Badaracco
• 2026/10/07 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Thomas Kissinger via dev
• 2026/10/06 Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Oct 7 Julien Le Dem
• 2026/10/06 Re: [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Micah Kornfield
• 2026/10/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Ryan Blue
• 2026/10/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Philipp Fischbeck via dev
• 2026/10/02 Re: [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Neelesh Salian
• 2026/10/01 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Costas Zarifis via dev
• 2026/10/01 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/30 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations (+ apologies) Julien Le Dem
• 2026/09/30 Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/30 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations (+ apologies) PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/30 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Sebastian Baunsgaard
• 2026/09/30 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations (+ apologies) Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/29 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/29 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/29 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/29 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/29 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/28 Re: [DISCUSS][Encoding] PFOR Encoding PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/28 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Philipp Fischbeck via dev
• 2026/09/26 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Gang Wu
• 2026/09/25 Re: [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Daniel Weeks
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Russell Spitzer
• 2026/09/24 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/24 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Thomas Kissinger via dev
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] FSST proposal final design review and move to implementation Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/24 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Russell Spitzer
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Daniel Weeks
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
• 2026/09/23 [ANNOUNCE] Lakehouse Day EU 2026 Danica Fine
• 2026/09/23 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
• 2026/09/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/22 Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Vinoo Ganesh
• 2026/09/22 Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Sep 22nd Julien Le Dem
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Steve Loughran
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Steve Loughran
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS][Encoding] PFOR Encoding PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS][Encoding] PFOR Encoding Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS][Encoding] PFOR Encoding Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
• 2026/09/22 Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/22 Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Adrian Garcia Badaracco via dev
• 2026/09/22 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
• 2026/09/22 Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/21 Introducing the Parquet Modular Footer Jiayi Wang
• 2026/09/21 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Thomas Kissinger via dev
• 2026/09/18 Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/18 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/18 Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/18 [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/16 Update the website for the 2.14 format release Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/16 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/15 Adding implementation to support matrix Michael Chavinda
• 2026/09/15 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Xiening Dai
• 2026/09/15 Re: Reminder: Footer Sync Coming Up Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/15 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/15 Reminder: Footer Sync Coming Up Jiayi Wang
• 2026/09/15 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? kurtiscwright
• 2026/09/14 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Andrew Bell
• 2026/09/14 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/14 Re: Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Gábor Szádovszky
• 2026/09/14 Re: Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Jörn Horstmann
• 2026/09/14 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/13 Re: [Parquet] ALP Encoding for Floating point data Vinoo Ganesh
• 2026/09/11 [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Neelesh Salian
• 2026/09/11 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/11 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/11 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/11 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/10 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/10 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/10 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/10 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/10 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/10 Re: Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Gábor Szádovszky
• 2026/09/10 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Gábor Szádovszky
• 2026/09/09 Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/09 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Daniel Weeks
• 2026/09/09 [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/09 Notes from Parquet sync Wednesday Sep 9th 2026 Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/09 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/09 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
• 2026/09/09 Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Jörn Horstmann
• 2026/09/09 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/09 Versioning discussion: Arrow IPC comparison Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/09 Re: Versioning discussion: Arrow IPC comparison Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/09 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Daniel Weeks
• 2026/09/09 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/09 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
• 2026/09/08 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Vinoo Ganesh
• 2026/09/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/08 Re: [Need facilitator] Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Sep 9th Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Daniel Weeks
• 2026/09/08 [Need facilitator] Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Sep 9th Julien Le Dem
• 2026/09/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Daniel Weeks
• 2026/09/08 Re: [Parquet] ALP Encoding for Floating point data PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/08 Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/08 [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
• 2026/09/08 CVE-2026-73334: Apache Parquet Hadoop: File-controlled KMS URL is forwarded to pluggable KmsClient that skips host validation Gidon Gershinsky
• 2026/09/08 Re: [DISCUSS][Encoding] PFOR Encoding PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/08 Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Stevo Mitrić via dev
• 2026/09/08 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/08 [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/08 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Gábor Szádovszky
• 2026/09/08 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/07 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Gang Wu
• 2026/09/07 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 László Bodor
• 2026/09/07 [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/07 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/07 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/07 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/07 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/07 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Neelesh Salian
• 2026/09/05 Re: [Parquet] ALP Encoding for Floating point data Vinoo Ganesh
• 2026/09/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Vinoo Ganesh
• 2026/09/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/05 Re: [Parquet] ALP Encoding for Floating point data Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/05 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/04 Re: Proposal: Extensible Decimal Floating-Point Type Costas Zarifis via dev
• 2026/09/04 Re: [Parquet] ALP Encoding for Floating point data PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/04 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Russell Spitzer
• 2026/09/04 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/04 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/04 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/04 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/04 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/04 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Gang Wu
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/03 [RESULT][VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Writing the version number in the footer Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/03 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Inline parquet.thrift into parquet-java Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/03 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations PRATEEK GAUR
• 2026/09/03 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
• 2026/09/03 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Jia Yu
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Inline parquet.thrift into parquet-java Russell Spitzer
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Inline parquet.thrift into parquet-java Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/03 [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/03 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Neelesh Salian
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Divjot Arora via dev
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Inline parquet.thrift into parquet-java Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Writing the version number in the footer Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/03 [DISCUSS] Writing the version number in the footer Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/03 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Gang Wu
• 2026/09/03 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Fokko Driesprong
• 2026/09/03 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Will Edwards via dev
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Inline parquet.thrift into parquet-java Gang Wu
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Inline parquet.thrift into parquet-java Gang Wu
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Inline parquet.thrift into parquet-java Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
• 2026/09/02 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Matt Topol
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
• 2026/09/02 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Yiming Li via dev
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
• 2026/09/02 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Micah Kornfield
• 2026/09/02 Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Neelesh Salian
• 2026/09/02 Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Russell Spitzer
• 2026/09/02 Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Russell Spitzer

• Earlier messages