I personally would rather we not use such a bot. If there are long running pull requests, ping the author and ask if the changes are still relevant, and if so, ask the author to rebase.
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 9:12 AM, Xinli shang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agree with Junjie for the longer limit. We have several long running > projects going on. Is there a white list with which we can bypass those > projects? > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 7:01 AM Junjie Chen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sounds good to have it. We might want to set the expiration limit to a >> larger value according to commit history. >> >> Driesprong, Fokko <[email protected]> 于2019年10月23日周三 下午9:32写道： >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would suggest enabling Stalebot on the parquet-mr repo: >>> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__probot.github.io_apps_stale_&d=DwIFaQ&c=r2dcLCtU9q6n0vrtnDw9vg&r=FQ88AmOZ4TMjDdqNBGu-ag&m=waE-QM8dEvNWOZVGIHKxSp6iLXF-rbGKmTghRDqrPoA&s=KPKNffiF3Y_HEfU3OLbnmVPqNeTmKXkmNX-KkIGlgGI&e= >>> >>> Right now we have a lot of stale PR's there which have many conflicts and >>> are not very likely to get merged anytime soon. The stalebot will mark >> the >>> Pull Request as stale after 60 days of inactivity, and close it after a >>> week if there isn't any further activity. This will reduce the number of >>> stale repositories. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Cheers, Fokko >> > -- > Xinli Shang
