jinyius commented on PR #988: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/988#issuecomment-1272784474
> Hi @jinyius and @matthieun, Thank both of you for the contribution and we really appreciate your patience with us. Now we have two PRs for the same issue, we better merge them into one. Given this PR is earlier, would it be a good idea to incorporate #995 into this PR for what is missing? @matthieun can add @jinyius as a co-author in that case. > > Does it make sense to both of you? i don't think merging will help here. both approaches do similar things in terms of traversing and expanding out the schema on recursive fields. the differ on the state used during the traversal, and they differ on how to deal with the remaining recursive data (this one silently ignores, but the mine stores as serialized bytes). i don't care about authorship. i want this to get fixed, and fixed properly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@parquet.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
