[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17696440#comment-17696440
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-2159:
-----------------------------------------
jiangjiguang commented on PR #1011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1011#issuecomment-1454733852
> Hi @gszadovszky , @wgtmac Thanks for your reviews and guidance during this
long review process. May we request to you please merge this PR by adding
following people as co-authors ( @jiangjiguang @jiyu1021 @guangzegu @Fang-Xie
@jatin-bhateja) alternatively make @jiangjiguang a committer so that he can
merge on our behalf.
@jatin-bhateja I have added them as co-authors on the first commit.
> Parquet bit-packing de/encode optimization
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-2159
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2159
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-mr
> Affects Versions: 1.13.0
> Reporter: Fang-Xie
> Assignee: Fang-Xie
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.13.0
>
> Attachments: image-2022-06-15-22-56-08-396.png,
> image-2022-06-15-22-57-15-964.png, image-2022-06-15-22-58-01-442.png,
> image-2022-06-15-22-58-40-704.png
>
>
> Current Spark use Parquet-mr as parquet reader/writer library, but the
> built-in bit-packing en/decode is not efficient enough.
> Our optimization for Parquet bit-packing en/decode with jdk.incubator.vector
> in Open JDK18 brings prominent performance improvement.
> Due to Vector API is added to OpenJDK since 16, So this optimization request
> JDK16 or higher.
> *Below are our test results*
> Functional test is based on open-source parquet-mr Bit-pack decoding
> function: *_public final void unpack8Values(final byte[] in, final int inPos,
> final int[] out, final int outPos)_* __
> compared with our implementation with vector API *_public final void
> unpack8Values_vec(final byte[] in, final int inPos, final int[] out, final
> int outPos)_*
> We tested 10 pairs (open source parquet bit unpacking vs ours optimized
> vectorized SIMD implementation) decode function with bit
> width=\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}, below are test results:
> !image-2022-06-15-22-56-08-396.png|width=437,height=223!
> We integrated our bit-packing decode implementation into parquet-mr, tested
> the parquet batch reader ability from Spark VectorizedParquetRecordReader
> which get parquet column data by the batch way. We construct parquet file
> with different row count and column count, the column data type is Int32, the
> maximum int value is 127 which satisfies bit pack encode with bit width=7,
> the count of the row is from 10k to 100 million and the count of the column
> is from 1 to 4.
> !image-2022-06-15-22-57-15-964.png|width=453,height=229!
> !image-2022-06-15-22-58-01-442.png|width=439,height=217!
> !image-2022-06-15-22-58-40-704.png|width=415,height=208!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
