wgtmac commented on PR #197: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/197#issuecomment-1790935198
> C++ PoC as well [rapidsai/cudf#14000](https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf/pull/14000). Do we still need arrow-cpp to proceed? If so, @mapleFU have you started on [apache/arrow#37869](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37869) yet? If not, I have cycles to try a first pass at an implementation if that would be helpful. IMHO, two PoC impls do not imply that they have to be parquet-mr and arrow-cpp. So should we proceed to a formal vote on this PR? @emkornfield @gszadovszky Once this PR has been merged, I can proceed the release process of parquet format v2.10. After that, all pending PoCs can be formally reviewed and merged. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
