[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17782189#comment-17782189
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-2261:
-----------------------------------------
wgtmac commented on PR #197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/197#issuecomment-1790935198
> C++ PoC as well
[rapidsai/cudf#14000](https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf/pull/14000). Do we still
need arrow-cpp to proceed? If so, @mapleFU have you started on
[apache/arrow#37869](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37869) yet? If not,
I have cycles to try a first pass at an implementation if that would be helpful.
IMHO, two PoC impls do not imply that they have to be parquet-mr and
arrow-cpp. So should we proceed to a formal vote on this PR? @emkornfield
@gszadovszky
Once this PR has been merged, I can proceed the release process of parquet
format v2.10. After that, all pending PoCs can be formally reviewed and merged.
> [Format] Add statistics that reflect decoded size to metadata
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-2261
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2261
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-format
> Reporter: Micah Kornfield
> Assignee: Micah Kornfield
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
