FWIW I started hacking up a prototype[1] of what a parquet-testing
integration suite might look like if anyone is interested



[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/5956

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:39 AM Alkis Evlogimenos
<alkis.evlogime...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:

> +1.
>
> I would suggest you address the comments first? I went through the open
> ones and most of them make sense to me (and left few additional comments).
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:42 PM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:40 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > > I agree with this sentiment, I asked on the PR if there would be
> another
> > > pass and then I can merge it.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Micah
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 3:20 AM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Parquet Devs,
> > > >
> > > > I propose we merge the first (admittedly bare bones) "Implementation
> > > > Status" page PR [1] to the website soon. I think this page is vital
> to
> > > the
> > > > Parquet community (and to any attempt to extend the format) so the
> > sooner
> > > > the better.
> > > >
> > > > The reason to merge the PR now is to have a base from which to build.
> > > That
> > > > PR is already over a year old and has so many comments it is hard to
> > > follow
> > > > or know what the path forward is. If we insist on sorting all the
> > details
> > > > out before we merge it I fear it will never merge.
> > > >
> > > > Once we have a page, I think the next steps are to add a preamble
> > > > explaining what it is for and to start trying to fill out the chart
> for
> > > an
> > > > implementation (I am happy to try for parquet-rs). I suspect during
> > that
> > > > process we will have to adjust some of the charts more.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your consideration (and thank you for all the comments
> so
> > > > far)
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/34
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to