On 09/12/2014 06:53 AM, Tom White wrote:
The artifacts should not have rc1 in their names. This is so that when the
vote passes they can be released without having to be rebuilt. For the
source tarball you can place it in a directory that has rc1 in the name.
For the Maven artifacts you should stage the release.
The NOTICE file has entries for SLF4J and Apache Thrift which should not be
present for the source distribution, see
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple.
Should the notice file differ between binary jars and the official
source release? I tried to make it clear in the wording that there is a
source dependency and it is only bundled with some binary distributions:
"This product depends on SLF4J and shades SLF4J in some binary artifacts."
Is this something that should be removed or is it not best practice? I
based this on how entries are done in the Spark NOTICE file [1].
rb
[1]: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v1.0.0/NOTICE#L221
--
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Cloudera, Inc.
