I know that. No problem.

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:23 PM, John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com> wrote:

> Hi Alin
>
> Thanks for your fix.
>
> >  it would be useful if it had the instance
> > variables protected rather than private, that way the class could be
> > extended as needed, like PDFTextStripper.
>
> The problem with making fields protected is that it exposes internal
> implementation details,
> making them part of the public API. This prevents us from making internal
> changes in the
> future without introducing breaking changes to the public API.
>
> In the case of PDFTextStripper, there is a strong use case for using a
> protected field,
> because overriding it is the primary mechanism for custom text extraction.
>
> Cheers
>
> -- John
>
> On 13 Mar 2014, at 10:40, Alin Mazilu <impet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, I will try. In my opinion it would be useful if it had the instance
> > variables protected rather than private, that way the class could be
> > extended as needed, like PDFTextStripper. It my situation I would only
> have
> > to override mergeDocuments(). Anyway, I will try it.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Alin
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Timo Boehme <timo.boe...@ontochem.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as far as I remember PDFMergeUtility is one of the last utilities not
> >> supporting loadNonSeq currently.
> >>
> >> As a workaround get the source of PDFMergeUtility, change
> PDDocument.load
> >> to PDDocument.loadNonSeq  (you may provide null as buffer parameter).
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Timo
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 13.03.2014 16:46, schrieb Alin Mazilu:
> >>
> >> Where? Here's the code that causes that:
> >>>
> >>> PDFMergeUtility util = new PDFMergeUtility();
> >>>
> >>> for (File file : set) {
> >>> try{
> >>> if( file.exists() ){
> >>>         util.addSource(file);
> >>> }
> >>>     } catch ( Exception e ){
> >>>        //log e
> >>>     }
> >>>  }
> >>> util.setDestinationFileName(...);
> >>>
> >>> util.mergeDocuments();
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Maruan Sahyoun <
> sahy...@fileaffairs.de
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> not a direct answer to your question but could you try
> >>>> PDDocument.loadNonSeq instead?
> >>>>
> >>>> BR
> >>>> Maruan Sahyoun
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 13.03.2014 um 16:16 schrieb Alin Mazilu <impet...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Has anyone had any problem with this? Any idea why it happens? What
> >>>>> would
> >>>>> be a good value for pushBackSize so this does not happen? Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Partial stack trace:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> org.apache.pdfbox.exceptions.WrappedIOException: Could not push back
> >>>>>
> >>>> 72940
> >>>>
> >>>>> bytes in order to reparse stream. Try increasing push back buffer
> using
> >>>>> system property org.apache.pdfbox.baseParser.pushBackSize
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                at
> >>>>>
> >>>>> org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.BaseParser.parseCOSStream(
> >>>> BaseParser.java:546)
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                at
> >>>>> org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.PDFParser.parseObject(PDFParser.java:566)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                at
> >>>>> org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.PDFParser.parse(PDFParser.java:187)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                at
> >>>>> org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.PDDocument.load(PDDocument.java:1071)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                at
> >>>>> org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.PDDocument.load(PDDocument.java:1038)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                at
> >>>>>
> >>>>> org.apache.pdfbox.util.PDFMergerUtility.mergeDocuments(
> >>>> PDFMergerUtility.java:186)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Timo Boehme
> >> OntoChem GmbH
> >> H.-Damerow-Str. 4
> >> 06120 Halle/Saale
> >> T: +49 345 4780474
> >> F: +49 345 4780471
> >> timo.boe...@ontochem.com
> >>
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> OntoChem GmbH
> >> Geschäftsführer: Dr. Lutz Weber
> >> Sitz: Halle / Saale
> >> Registergericht: Stendal
> >> Registernummer: HRB 215461
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to