Hi,
Am 11.08.2014 18:35, schrieb John Hewson:
Andreas,
What I had been thinking was that now that 2.0 is getting closer that me wight
want to do less with 1.8, but I agree with you that we don’t need any fixed
rules, staying flexible is better. It sounds like we might want to think about
some guidelines for 1.8 after 2.0 is released to avoid a “Windows XP”
situation, but we’re not at that point yet.
Yes, good point. Hopefully 1.8.7 will be the last 1.8 release before 2.0 :-)
Cheers
-- John
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
On 11 Aug 2014, at 03:57, Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de> wrote:
Hi,
John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com> hat am 7. August 2014 um 18:48 geschrieben:
Perhaps we should stop adding new features to 1.8, and only fix the most
problematic bugs?
We never were that strict about the contents of a bugfix release in the past.
We always added some improvements or new features. Most of them were small
and/or hadn't a huge impact on the code/functionality. Some were added
because people were eagerly waiting for them. There aren't any rules what
to add or not and IMHO we don't need any.
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
-- John
On 7 Aug 2014, at 09:11, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote:
+1
but after I've ported the GSoC2014-improved shading package to 1.8
Tilman
Am 07.08.2014 12:35, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
Hi,
there is already a number of solved issues and I guess it's
time for a new bugfix release.
I'm working on PDFBOX-2250 and I'd like to finish that
first but how about a new release in 2 or 3 weeks from now?
WDYT?
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
