Am 14.10.2014 um 19:39 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
I prefer that the "old" parser not be removed, because there are many files that
can only be parsed by the old parser. This came out in a large scale test with
TIKA.
There is one additional reason to keep the old one, the signing stuff doesn't
work with the non-sequential parser.
BR
Andreas
The best idea (in my current opinion) is to use the nonSeq parser first, and the
old parser if there is an exception.
Tilman
Am 14.10.2014 um 09:45 schrieb Timo Boehme:
Hi,
Am 14.10.2014 um 07:22 schrieb John Hewson:
Hi,
John Hewson <[email protected]> hat am 10. Oktober 2014 um 20:05 geschrieben:
- Parsing (Andreas?)
I guess we won't get a complete new parser in 2.0, but I try to improve the
XRef
and the COSStream stuff
It would be great if we could get rid of the old parser and switch to the
non-sequential
parser, WDYT?
I would also propose to completely remove the old parser. That way we are more
flexible in parsing streams etc. since parts of the non-sequential parser are
a compromise to work side-by-side with the old parser.
Possibly there are a small number of functions for which the old parser is
still needed - e.g. signing?
Best,
Timo
