It’s under a 3-clause BSD license, so yes. There’s an additional license for 
the JJ 2000 code which adds the non-open (according to the OSI definition) 
cause that the source/binary license is only granted for "JPEG 2000 Standard 
conforming products”, which isn’t going to be a problem for us, at least.

I have a fork here where the relevant licenses have been extracted from the 
source https://github.com/jahewson/jai-imageio-core 
<https://github.com/jahewson/jai-imageio-core>

-- John

> On 30 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Don't know if this is legal :-(
> 
> Tilman
> 
> Am 30.10.2014 um 23:14 schrieb John Hewson:
>> Could we push our own copy to e.g. maven central?
>> 
>> -- John
>> 
>>> On 30 Oct 2014, at 14:04, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> That one doesn't work... that is a link to maven central, to
>>> http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/media/jai_imageio/1.1/
>>> and it has only the javadocs :-(
>>> 
>>> Tilman
>>> 
>>>> Am 30.10.2014 um 21:32 schrieb John Hewson:
>>>> What about http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.sun.media/jai_imageio ?
>>>> 
>>>> — John
>>>> 
>>>>> On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:31, John Hewson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 30.10.2014 um 20:37 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 30.10.2014 um 20:29 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>>>>>>> Does anybody know a maven repository for jai_imageio? Currently we use
>>>>>>> http://repository.mygrid.org.uk/ but that site is getting very 
>>>>>>> unreliable.
>>>>>> Why do we use that specific version from mygrid?
>>>>> The problem isn't the version, the problem is the repository... we need a 
>>>>> repository because we don't want to have that file permanently in the 
>>>>> build for legal reason. So it is only temporarly loaded by maven for 
>>>>> testing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the meantime I found
>>>>> http://repo.spring.io/repo/com/sun/media/jai_imageio/
>>>>> but haven't tested it yet.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tilman
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tilman
>>>>>> BR
>>>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
> 

Reply via email to