[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14284363#comment-14284363
]
Tilman Hausherr edited comment on PDFBOX-2610 at 1/20/15 8:36 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~msahyoun] Going back to the file good0002.pdf from PDFBOX-2416 - it brings
the error
{quote}
7.1 : Error on MetaData, Invalid array definition, expecting Bag and found
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.DeferredTextImpl [prefix=photoshop;
name=SupplementalCategories]
{quote}
The cause is this part of the XMP:
{code}
<rdf:Description rdf:about=""
xmlns:photoshop="http://ns.adobe.com/photoshop/1.0/";>
<photoshop:Headline>Photoshop Headline</photoshop:Headline>
<photoshop:SupplementalCategories>Category 1, Category
2</photoshop:SupplementalCategories>
</rdf:Description>
{code}
In PDFBOX-2416, you wrote:
{quote}
I’d think that this is more related to how namespaces are handled in PDFBox
XMP. The original issue could be a hint for that. According to the PDF/A and
XMP specification the file should be validated OK.
{quote}
My understanding from reading the XMP specifications (part 1 and 2) is that
SupplementalCategories is an "unordered array of Text" and should be like this
one:
{code}
<photoshop:SupplementalCategories>
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li>nnn-nnn-nnnn</rdf:li>
<rdf:li>xx...@yyy.zz</rdf:li>
<rdf:li>unclassified</rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag>
</photoshop:SupplementalCategories>
{code}
Can you explain why you think it is OK? PDF Tools also thinks it is OK.
was (Author: tilman):
Going back to the file good0002.pdf from PDFBOX-2416 - it brings the error
{quote}
7.1 : Error on MetaData, Invalid array definition, expecting Bag and found
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.DeferredTextImpl [prefix=photoshop;
name=SupplementalCategories]
{quote}
The cause is this part of the XMP:
{code}
<rdf:Description rdf:about=""
xmlns:photoshop="http://ns.adobe.com/photoshop/1.0/";>
<photoshop:Headline>Photoshop Headline</photoshop:Headline>
<photoshop:SupplementalCategories>Category 1, Category
2</photoshop:SupplementalCategories>
</rdf:Description>
{code}
In PDFBOX-2416, you wrote:
{quote}
I’d think that this is more related to how namespaces are handled in PDFBox
XMP. The original issue could be a hint for that. According to the PDF/A and
XMP specification the file should be validated OK.
{quote}
My understanding from reading the XMP specifications (part 1 and 2) is that
SupplementalCategories is an "unordered array of Text" and should be like this
one:
{quote}
<photoshop:SupplementalCategories>
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li>nnn-nnn-nnnn</rdf:li>
<rdf:li>xx...@yyy.zz</rdf:li>
<rdf:li>unclassified</rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag>
</photoshop:SupplementalCategories>
{quote}
Can you explain why you think it is OK? PDF Tools also thinks it is OK.
> Expand Isartor test for Bavaria test suite and other tests
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-2610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2610
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Preflight
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Tilman Hausherr
> Assignee: Tilman Hausherr
>
> 1) Expand the isartor test code so that it can also check conforming
> documents, i.e. documents that should not bring any errors. Support JBIG2.
> 2) Test the files from the Bavaria suite with preflight. I'll create
> sub-issues on that one. I counted 16 where something doesn't work as intented.
> 3) Include the Bavaria tests in the build. Only if we agree on this one. If
> not, I'll just keep it for myself as an additional regression test.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
