Interesting, yes: 781/781172.pdf, 490/490376.pdf and 029/029423.pdf. Are you
running your own regression testing against govdocs1? Is it duplicated effort
for me to do anything with 2.0.0? Or, is your point that should I wait until
PDFBOX-2842 is completed?
Thank you!
Best,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Tilman Hausherr [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: first stack trace report from pdfbox 2.0.0 trunk
Hi Tim,
Currently there is at least one known regression, mentioned in
PDFBOX-2842, it applies to 029423 but also to other files.
Tilman
Am 10.07.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Allison, Timothy B.:
> All,
> I just posted the first stacktrace report from my initial partial batch
> run of against govdocs1 here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12744700/pdfbox_reports_2_0_0_20150709.zip
>
> Caveats/Notes
>
> The run yesterday did not include the fixes that were made in PDFBOX-2370 or
> PDFBOX-2862.
>
> I stopped the batch run early. This only covered ~50k pdfs.
>
> I forgot to turn on accesspermission checking. Some of the pdfs in here would
> normally have been skipped.
>
> I haven't reviewed any of the exceptions. They may be caused by code on the
> Tika side.
>
> I'll plan to re-run with the latest trunk on Tuesday. I need to turn back to
> the actual eval code for a bit. :)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
