Am 01.10.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Ben McCann:
Wow, tons of great progress in the past week in getting to 2.0. There's
currently only a single issue open that's marked as a blocker
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2893?jql=project%20%3D%20PDFBOX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.0.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC>.
Hopefully we can agree on a what to name the COSStream methods and then get
an RC out for people to test with since that'd really help in identifying
any issues that may be present. Super excited by how close we are!

LOL, you make that sound like we're all from that 1/3 part of the Golgafrincham planet (younger readers may want to google this), but the real issues are PDFBOX-2883 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2883>(Timo wanted to do something there), and a few minor ones that John may want to do something. I'll do the "transfer work" on PDFBOX-2423 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2423>and then set that one to resolved too.

Tilman

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Ben McCann <benjamin.j.mcc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

It seems like 2.0 is close and provides some good benefits over 1.8. I was
wondering if there's any plans regarding a 2.0 release?

There are only a dozen issues currently open and tagged for 2.0
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2370?jql=project%20%3D%20PDFBOX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.0.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC>.
It might be a good time to cut an RC release so that we can start getting
more feedback and better indentifying what 2.0 blockers might be out there?

Thanks,
Ben




Reply via email to