Hi,
yes, we should do a RC as proposed by you. I would say we will strive
for keeping the API stable (or do only backward compatible
changes/additions), however this mostly depends on the user feedback we get.
I would also support an expected date for the final release as Maruan
proposed.
Best,
Timo
Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
Hi,
in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next week
on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before:
- Are we still in the same boat? Are there any concerns not to do a release and
postpone it?
- RC or "real" release?
If we do a RC the following is done/expected
- we expect the API to be stable, but there may be some anyway if neccessary
- I won't create a 2.0.0 branch
- I'll deploy the RC to maven central and we'll provide the RC for download
through our website
- I won't close any jira tickets
Did I forget anything else?
BR
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
--
Timo Boehme
OntoChem IT Solutions GmbH
Blücherstraße 24
06120 Halle (Saale)
Germany
phone: +49 345 478 047 4 | fax: +49 345 478 047 1
email: ulf.la...@ontochem.com | web: www.ontochem.com
HRB 21962 Amtsgericht Stendal | USt-IdNr.: DE815563824
managing director : Lutz Weber
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
