[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14980031#comment-14980031
]
Maruan Sahyoun commented on PDFBOX-3040:
----------------------------------------
well - Jekyll already works and all the changes done lately are done on the
jekyll-migration branch and published directly. So we can switch over any time!
{quote}
Could maybe adjust the viewport for a
{quote}
Of course that's doable but I'd rather have a more responsive approach as the
sidebar navigation takes a lot of screen on a mobile and is barely readable
when we default to showing the entire page.
{quote}
We use the same website format as Hadoop, Commons, FOP, etc. It works. It's
what people expect.
{quote}
There are also many sample for a different approach :-)
IMHO the main benefit of having only 3 main topics is simplicity.
> Move website to local build tool
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-3040
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3040
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 1.8.9, 1.8.10, 2.0.0
> Reporter: Maruan Sahyoun
>
> As discussed on the dev mailing list the PDFBox website will be migrated to a
> local build:
> - to have an easier support for a new/blog section
> - an actively developed toolchain to build the site
> The site builder will be based on jekyll with some additional scripting/maven
> to automate the develop/build/test/publishing steps.
> There are some projects we can learn from such as Apache Wicket, JClouds.
> The initial development will be done in a branch to the current svn
> repository.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
