Am 26.05.2016 um 19:53 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
Am 26.05.2016 um 19:50 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]>:
Am 26.05.2016 um 19:45 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
Am 26.05.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]>:
Am 26.05.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
Hi,
Am 26.05.2016 um 17:45 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]>:
Hi,
Am 26.05.2016 um 17:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
Hi,
from time to time I come across a method signature with … throws IOException
where the code will not throw an exception and as such the declaration is nt
neccessary.
Can we remove such declarations in minor releases (e.g. 2.1) or does that need
a major release (e.g. 3.0).
I'm afraid that's a change which requires a major release. Which leads to the
question if we might change the trunk from 2.1 to 3.0 and create an additional
2.1 branch:
WDYT?
I'm not in favor of that as we already have to apply patches to 1.8.x, 2.0.x
and 2.1. If there is yet another active branch that adds to that. I'll open an
issue for 3.0 to not forget about that.
That's correct, but once we introduce an major change, we have to do that
split, but only if we want to introduce a possible 2.1 version.
I'd see us do a 2.1 as we want to keep PDFBox stable for a while and not do
another major release 'shortly'
The 1.8. branch will become more and more obsolete. IMHO we won't cut more than
1 or 2 more releases.
Maybe do a 2.1 in the not to far future (August?) and retire 1.8 after that.
We could agree on the topics to work on for 2.1. For me that's
My main wish would be a 2.0.2 release due to the signature bug.
we could do that right away - if the release manager finds the time :-)
I already thought about a new release before going on summer holiday. How about
cutting a release in round about 10 days from now?
BR
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
