Looks good. One file has fewer pages: govdocs1/229/229205.pdf Based on the content diffs, it looks like I compared 2.0.13-SNAPSHOT against 2.0.11 (/data4/batch_runs/tika_1_19-rc1). We upgraded to 2.0.12 in 1.19.1. Given that I don't see any differences, I think we're good. However, I'm happy to re-run with 2.0.12 as the baseline.
The reports are here: http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_pdfbox_2_0_13-pre-rc.tgz On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:22 PM Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de> wrote: > > Am 25.11.18 um 11:01 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > > Am 24.11.18 um 10:15 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > >> Am 24.11.2018 um 08:53 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > >>> How about cutting a release next week or a week later? > > I'm going to cut the release next Tuesday the 27th. > I'm going to postpone the preparations until we have hopefully positive test > results from Tim > > Andreas > > > > > If there are any objections I postpone the release to the following Monday > > the > > 3th of December. > > > > > > Andreas > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
