[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17003271#comment-17003271
]
Maruan Sahyoun commented on PDFBOX-4669:
----------------------------------------
The last addition was done to show that using direct objects will work when
removing objects from {{COSArrayList}}
The same test will fail if trying to remove indirect objects as pointed out in
above comment from mkl @ stackoverflow
Will work on fixing that. We shall also deprecate the
\{{COSArrayList.getCOSArray}} method in 2.0 and remove \{{COSArrayList.toList}}
for 3.0. Getting the underlying {{COSArray}} from {{COSArrayList}} would allow
for direct manipulation and which will would bring both internal lists out of
sync. Doing the same by going a different route to get access to the
{{COSArray}} would have the same effect but this way we at least discourage
that use.
> Ensure proper functionality of COSArrayList
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-4669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4669
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: PDModel
> Affects Versions: 2.0.17, 3.0.0 PDFBox
> Reporter: Maruan Sahyoun
> Assignee: Maruan Sahyoun
> Priority: Major
>
> The current COSArrayList implementation has some glitches as pointed out at
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45812696/
> In addition when working with {{AnnotationFilter}} as the
> adding/update/removal is index based the wron index of the underlying
> {{COSArray}} is affected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
