Fine - so let‘s target that for 4x > Am 18.03.2023 um 16:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]>: > > Am 18.03.23 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> I‘d second a move to 11 for 3.x as for the lifetime of 3.x this will enable >> us to use newer funtions without another major release. > I'd like to do so for the next major version 4.0.x. Hopefully it won't take > us that much time to release that version as it took us to release 3.0.x. > > BTW 3.0.x will be the last version supporting preflight and maybe it is a > good idea to stuck with java 8 compatibility. > > Andreas >> BR >> Maruan >>>> Am 18.03.2023 um 10:13 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]>: >>> >>> You may have a point with some of your arguments, but not this one: >>>> Public updates for Java 8 have stopped in march 2022, now one year ago >>> >>> My latest jdk8 is from January 17th of this year. (Amazon Corretto) >>> >>> About the difficulty to find contributors - this has always been difficult. >>> That's because PDF isn't "sexy" at all. >>> >>> Coincidentally, our CI builds are now failing because of Jenkins / Hudson >>> has moved to jdk11. >>> >>> Tilman >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
