We're getting a build failure on this test now.  I'll turn it off for
the build and run the full process.

https://github.com/apache/tika/blob/main/tika-parsers/tika-parsers-standard/tika-parsers-standard-modules/tika-parser-pdf-module/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/parser/pdf/PDFParserTest.java#L1031

org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: Should have thrown exception ==>
expected: <true> but was: <false>
    at 
org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.build(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:151)
    at 
org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.buildAndThrow(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:132)
    at org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertTrue.failNotTrue(AssertTrue.java:63)
    at org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertTrue.assertTrue(AssertTrue.java:36)
    at org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue(Assertions.java:211)
    at 
org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParserTest.testSkipBadPage(PDFParserTest.java:1044)

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:41 AM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Y. Will start process now. Thank you!
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:20 AM Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've finished the release process and provided a releases candidate for 
> > 2.0.28
> >
> > @Tim Is there any chance to re-run the tests in the next 3 days, so that we
> > could stop the release if there is any major regression.
> >
> > I don't expect any new issue as the last changes should produces less 
> > exceptions
> > than before but you knows ....
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> >
> > Am 10.04.23 um 11:42 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> > >
> > > Am 10.04.23 um 04:32 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
> > >> On 09.04.2023 22:36, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
> > >>> OK, so there is one more question left: do we need to re-run the tests 
> > >>> before
> > >>> starting the release process?
> > >>
> > >> Yes I prefer to have another comparison, but it can be done in parallel.
> > > Good idea, I'm going to cut the release ...
> > >
> > > Andreas
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Tilman
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Andreas
> > >>>
> > >>> Am 09.04.23 um 20:56 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
> > >>>> On 09.04.2023 17:35, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I've fixed the issue with 2 of the 3 pdfs.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> GHOSTSCRIPT-702891-0.pdf is left as the only problematic pdf. I didn't
> > >>>>> found a solution which fixes the regressions and still fixes the 
> > >>>>> origin
> > >>>>> issue from PDFBOX-5178. The parser from the trunk is able to handle 
> > >>>>> that
> > >>>>> pdf well.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> IMHO we should leave it alone, as it is malformed anmd doesn't 
> > >>>>> contain any
> > >>>>> useful content. More important, it is one pdf out of hundreds of
> > >>>>> thoudsands, just a corner cases.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> WDYT?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I agree!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Tilman
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Andreas
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Am 05.04.23 um 08:10 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> > >>>>>> Am 04.04.23 um 07:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> > >>>>>>> Am 03.04.23 um 19:50 schrieb Tim Allison:
> > >>>>>>>> https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/reports/pdfbox-2.0.27-v-2.0.28-20230403-reports.tgz
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Haven't had a chance to take a look yet. :(
> > >>>>>>> Thanks Tim!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> There are still 5 new exceptions listed. All of them are related to 
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> very same change coming from PDFBOX-5178 which I've fixed the other 
> > >>>>>>> day.
> > >>>>>>> But these cases are different and the trunk is affected as well. My 
> > >>>>>>> bad
> > >>>>>>> to not have a deeper look in the first place.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I'm going to investigate those issues
> > >>>>>> All pdfs are more or less broken. Two of them are totally useless 
> > >>>>>> and the
> > >>>>>> new exception is just another one. The other three contain some more 
> > >>>>>> or
> > >>>>>> less readable content and we are hitting the well know dilemma: 
> > >>>>>> should we
> > >>>>>> stop reading once we hit something bad or should we try to read as 
> > >>>>>> much as
> > >>>>>> possible and maybe run into much bigger issues than before.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I guess these are all some special corner cases. I'm still thinking 
> > >>>>>> about
> > >>>>>> a solution to support both strategies.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Andreas
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Andreas
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:53 AM Tilman Hausherr 
> > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Don't wait please
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>> Tilman
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --- Original-Nachricht ---
> > >>>>>>>>> Von: Tim Allison
> > >>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Fwd: 2.0.28 release?
> > >>>>>>>>> Datum: 03. April 2023, 12:47
> > >>>>>>>>> An: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Y. I can kick that off now. Or should I wait?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 2:06 PM Andreas Lehmkuehler 
> > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> @Tim <mailto:@Tim>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Is there any chance to re-run the tests?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Andreas
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Am 01.04.23 um 17:08 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Am 01.04.23 um 17:05 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've accidentally send this to Tim only :-|
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: 2.0.28 release?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Datum: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 07:50:10 +0200
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Von: Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected] 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> An: Tim Allison <[email protected] 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 30.03.23 um 16:27 schrieb Tim Allison:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reports are here:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> <https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/reports/pdfbox-2.0.27-v-2.0.28-SNAPSHOT.tgz>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Tim.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like we have a regression. There is a handful of new 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> exceptions.
> > >>>>>>>>> Some of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> them just replace another exception and it is unclear if the 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> result is
> > >>>>>>>>> better
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> or worse. But at least one of the pdfs works in 2.0.27 and 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't in
> > >>>>>>>>> 2.0.28
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> bug_trackers/PDFBOX/PDFBOX-4424-1.pdf
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll have a look
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The regression was related to PDFBOX-5178. I've fixed it so 
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that the
> > >>>>>>>>> exceptions
> > >>>>>>>>>>> should be gone.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Andreas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Andreas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:42 PM Tilman Hausherr <
> > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes please!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tilman
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 28.03.2023 19:22, Tim Allison wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should I run the regression tests now or is there anything 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else
> > >>>>>>>>> text
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related that is still being worked on?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:05 PM Tilman Hausherr <
> > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tilman
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 28.03.2023 08:46, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how about cutting a 2.0.28 release next week on Monday?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a bunch of solved tickets and the last release 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dates
> > >>>>>>>>> back 6
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> months
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andreas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to