[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17795623#comment-17795623
]
Andreas Lehmkühler commented on PDFBOX-5731:
--------------------------------------------
I didn't get your point. The following test demonstrates how the cache works
{code}
@Test
void checkCache()
{
COSName nameBlubb1 = COSName.getPDFName("blubb");
COSName nameBlubb2 = COSName.getPDFName("blubb");
// due to the underlying cache nameBlubb1 and nameBlubb2 share the same
instance
assertTrue(nameBlubb1 == nameBlubb2);
assertEquals(nameBlubb1, nameBlubb2);
// clear the cache
COSName.clearResources();
// blubb1 and blubb2 still share the same instances and therefore are
still identical
assertTrue(nameBlubb1 == nameBlubb2);
assertEquals(nameBlubb1, nameBlubb2);
// get another COSName value for "blubb"
COSName nameBlubb3 = COSName.getPDFName("blubb");
// nameBlubb3 is another instance of COSName for the value "blubb"
assertFalse(nameBlubb1 == nameBlubb3);
// both instances are still equal as the underlying strings have equal
values
assertEquals(nameBlubb1, nameBlubb3);
}
{code}
IMHO everything is fine
> org.apache.pdfbox.cos.COSName#nameMap There is a memory leak problem.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-5731
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5731
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0.30, 3.0.1 PDFBox
> Reporter: liu
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2023-12-08-16-02-12-293.png, screenshot-1.png,
> screenshot-2.png, screenshot-3.png
>
>
> !image-2023-12-08-16-02-12-293.png!
> !screenshot-1.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
