[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-6085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18032124#comment-18032124
 ] 

Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-6085:
-----------------------------------------

my debug notes in case this bothers us in the future

==

!! look in "data" in the debugger in GlyphData.initData(), not in the fontfile 
dump

input codes: 'A', 8204:

8204 becomes GID 132
'A' becomes GID 960

data offset 44 = 0x2c  contours: 0x0028 = 40

position before reading contours: 54, 80 bytes to read

data len: 120

gid 960 is A
input read pos 204212 WRONG in addCompoundReferences before reading buffer, len 
74  

writing: write pos is 44, complete buf has len 74, contains the WRONG 0x0028 
contour count

Comparison when using 'A' only:

input read pos 190498 GOOD in addCompoundReferences before reading buffer, len 
74, 2 contours GOOD

> TTFSubsetter.buildGlyfTable() modifies glyphIds while iterating over its 
> entries possibly causing ConcurrentModificationException to be thrown
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-6085
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-6085
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.35, 3.0.6 PDFBox
>            Reporter: Constantine Dokolas
>            Assignee: Tilman Hausherr
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: PDFBOX-6085-demo.pdf
>
>
> Modifying a {{TreeSet}} while iterating over its members is prohibited as it 
> may throw a {{ConcurrentModificationException}} if the set is actually 
> modified.
> This can be observed during subsetting some fonts, e.g. Devanagari 
> (NotoSansDevanagari).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to