Hi Claude Ok my bad, I misunderstood. Sorry about that.
Regards JB Le ven. 28 oct. 2022 à 16:46, Claude Warren, Jr <[email protected]> a écrit : > This is not about the Pekko Incubation proposal which was already accepted > but about the process proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PEKKO/Processes > > Looking back I can see how this was confusing. > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I don't think the discussion should be in the proposal. The proposal > > is really about the project (defintion, objectives, community), not > > development process on its own as each project decides, assuming > > following basic Apache rules. > > > > Committer-ship (and PPMC) is basically well described at Apache > > (Justin already shared the link afair). > > > > We will find a consensus/balance between Apache rules and willing from > > Pekko community. Clearly, Pekko seems to be already a mature project > > with existing rules. So, with slight adjustment, we will have > > something. > > > > Now, I'm more a little concerned about the way too long discussion. > > For instance, the discussion between Commit-Then-Review or > > Review-Then-Commit is required betweens committers, but doesn't impact > > the incubation process. > > > > Using existing projects as template is not super interesting because > > each project is unique somehow. > > Let's be pragmatic and move forward on the code push adjusted with > > Apache requirements. Then, step by step we can adjust. > > > > Too much information kills the information :) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 9:22 AM Claude Warren, Jr > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The other discussion has rightly concentrated on how contributions will > > be > > > made. I wanted to split out a new conversation about committers. > > > > > > There are a number of committer requests on the github discussion [1] > > that > > > were not included in the original pekko proposal. This conversation > > > probably should have been closed to new comments a while ago. Is > there a > > > way to close a conversation? > > > > > > We need a section in the process for electing new committers. I > propose > > > the following section for the process documentation: (the X to be > > replaced > > > with the next section number) > > > > > > X Committers > > > > > > 1. New committers will be nominated on the private mailing list. > > > 2. New committers will be accepted after a 24 hour vote if there are > > > more positive than negative votes. > > > 3. New committers must demonstrate sustained contribution to the > > project > > > in either code, documentation, or community building. > > > 4. Once accepted, committer candidates will be given the opportunity > > to > > > reject the committer mantle. > > > 5. Only after the committer accepts will they be added to the > > committer > > > list. > > > > > > Claude > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/mdedetrich/akka-apache-project/discussions/3 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
