Relevant JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-615
(which in summary is about as confused as I am :))

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:09 PM Johannes Rudolph
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Echoing PJ's relevant response at
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-http/pull/14
>
> > In practice, ASF projects don't collect CLAs from every user who submits a 
> > PR. There is no magic criterion for what makes a PR significant enough to 
> > require one but the PR changes 70 files, even if the changes are not very 
> > large.
>
> It's hard to gather relevant information here. As stated above the
> Apache site linked prominently on the Apache website says that a CLA
> is required for any kind of contribution in very clear language:
>
> > All contributors of ideas, code, or documentation to any Apache projects 
> > must complete, sign, and submit via email an Individual Contributor License 
> > Agreement (ICLA).
>
> On the other hand Roy Fielding himself said this in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0mytpqj7too29bj90yz65rggdv7gd35d:
>
> > Again, there is no such requirement for commits/pushes at Apache.
> > The person responsible for moving the bits into our repository
> > is responsible for verifying that they have the right to do so
> > before the push is made.  The authors do not need to have a CLA
> > on file even if the contribution is massive -- CLAs are only
> > required for the people who want an account at Apache and thus
> > are allowed to make the decision to push those bits into our
> > repository.
>
> Which says almost exactly the opposite, in fact, that no non-committer
> contribution ever needs a CLA. Is that thinking outdated by now?
>
> Searching through the Flink and Kafka Github repos it seems that the
> topic has almost never come up in a PR (low single digit number of
> total occurrences, though you cannot trust Github search). Where it
> came up, mostly when complete modules where contributed.
>
> I tend to get the impression that we should *not* require a CLA in
> general from external contributors but (in spirit of what Roy Fielding
> wrote) we might want to add a section to the PR template that makes it
> clear that a contribution was done under the terms of the APL2.
>
> Johannes

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to