👋 having a 1.0.0 would potentially unlock more contributions, because the biggest barrier to adoption is lack of time; FOSS investments can be more easily justified when the project is actively depended on at $work.

On 18 May 2023, at 21:47, Michael Seydel wrote:

Same as Mehmet, I looked and found that it was non-coding blocking the 1.0
release.

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:34 PM Mehmet Salgar <[email protected]> wrote:

* It was pointed out that the health of the current contributors isn't the best (i.e. majority of work is being done by a few people). While there
are
various factors behind this (such as work necessary for first release requires a lot of SBT knowledge, something that only a few people can provide right now) the bigger point to be made here is that its a chicken and egg situation ergo potential contributors are holding back because
they
want confidence in the Pekko project before devoting their time however
for
the project to be more successful we need more contributors for the first
release.

This will sound stupid but a while ago I tried to figure out what I can do for Pekko, while I was expecting that somebody would tell me take this Issue and fix/implement it, the answer was choose an issue and work with it, I looked for three issue s, later to discover other people are working on those and then there was some private stuff and I could not be that
active with contributing.

Now I have more time and am I looking ways to contribute, now is there anybody distributing issues or I still have to figure something myself?

Thx for answers...



Gesendet: Montag, 08. Mai 2023 um 08:37 Uhr
Von: "Matthew Benedict de Detrich" <[email protected]>
An: [email protected], [email protected]
Betreff: Plans for Pekko (core) 1.0.0 release
Johannes, PJ Fanning and myself had a discussion last week to regarding future plans regarding the Pekko 1.0.0 release, below are the generate
points discussed on this topic

* We should focus on doing a Pekko release first for the core module
* In terms of actual technical work that needs to be done for a future first release, there doesn't appear to be a lot. The last main piece of work should be https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/281. There
is
also Scala 3.3 LTS but considering there is already an open PR for RC4 on
this (see
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/270[https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/270])
and RC4 is
expected to be the last RC before release, this shouldn't be a concern. The main thing to look at here is the docker image that Johannes made to help
in creating a release (see

https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/188[https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/188]
)
* There are still open questions regarding legal questions (i.e. headers) but considering feedback is given on this by the community on a voluntary
basis, its best to start off the release sooner rather than later to
trigger/solicit some proper feedback on this topic otherwise we would be
waiting for an extortionate amount of time.
* Users of Akka looking to transition to Pekko have raised concerns
regarding the release schedule and how long it's taking. While it is true that the release is taking a long amount of time, it should be pointed out that this shouldn't be indicative of future releases. In other words, a large reason why the release is taking a long amount of time is that we had
to deliberate, discuss, plan and actually develop the Apache release
process for the first time. Pekko is also a hard fork which is never easy
and the current release process is reflecting that.
* It was pointed out that the health of the current contributors isn't the best (i.e. majority of work is being done by a few people). While there are
various factors behind this (such as work necessary for first release
requires a lot of SBT knowledge, something that only a few people can
provide right now) the bigger point to be made here is that its a chicken and egg situation ergo potential contributors are holding back because they want confidence in the Pekko project before devoting their time however for the project to be more successful we need more contributors for the first
release.
* We have decided to publish a MILESTONE in the snapshots repository to provide an indication that a release is coming soon. This will occur after

https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/270[https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/270],
also because

https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/270[https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/270]
will require downstream
changes to every Pekko module (and its easier to refer to a MILESTONE
version rather than just git hashes).
* Documentation for the rest of the Pekko modules should be published but
we shouldn't worry too much about getting the versioning of the docs
correct. Having something there is better than nothing, especially
considering that documentation is the first thing that users look for.

Additional comments are welcome.

--

Matthew de Detrich

*Aiven Deutschland GmbH*

Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin

Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B

Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen

*m:* +491603708037

*w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




--
Alexandru Nedelcu
https://alexn.org

Reply via email to