In this thread, I am talking about code with annotations saying they
are deprecated.

We have a new issue raised today and it can't proceed until we agree
when it is safe to remove deprecated methods.

https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/526


On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 12:58, Matthew de Detrich
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can we be a bit more prescriptive in this discussion thread? i.e. there is
> a big
> difference between removing some methods which have have been annotated
> with @deprecated versus entire features such as classic remoting (I don't
> think there is any contention about the former).
>
> We also need to consider how CVE's change the equation, i.e. I don't think
> it's a good faith argument to tell people to remain on older versions of
> Pekko
> to use features that have known CVE's especially since we spent effort in
> delaying the release because of CVE's (there is a bit of lack of
> consistency here).
>
> If we make this distinction between larger features and more trivial ones
> I think it's more appropriate to treat those said larger features on a case
> by case basis (i.e. each having their own discussion thread and then a
> voting round if there is contention). If nothing else this will raise
> awareness of those features, Pekko is big and we inherited a lot from
> Akka so I think there is merit in at least having a high level understanding
> of how much code is considered deprecated.
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:27 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Tying in with other discussions about what is permissible in the
> > 'improvements' release of Pekko core. It is tentatively called v1.1.0
> > but I suspect that we end up calling it v2.0.0 - if the changes are
> > big enough.
> >
> > I'm going to suggest that we should consider anything that was
> > deprecated before Akka 2.6.0 as fair game for removal in Pekko v1.1.0.
> >
> > Please feel free to suggest alternatives
> >
> > Regards,
> > PJ
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Matthew de Detrich
>
> *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
>
> Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
>
> Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
>
> Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
>
> *m:* +491603708037
>
> *w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to